Very best safest distance from the 5G cell Tower?

Very best safest distance from the 5G cell Tower?

If you've ever walked through a city you might have noticed tiny mini 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They look like little boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cellular providers to your mobile.

These smaller towers are replacing larger specially-designed cell towers. Although they're not as visible but they can still cause issues for users.
It is the Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the maximum amount of time one can expose to electromagnetic energy from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based upon scientific research that prove that electromagnetic energy can be harmful to health.

how to block radiation  (SAR) is a measure of the radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. It's usually 1.6 milliwatts per kilogram spread over a Gram of tissue.

However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies this could be able to cause greater energy intensity on the skin and other exposed body areas.  how to block electromagnetic waves  could lead to many potential harms, including exacerbated formation of skin disorders such as dermatitis and cataracts and skin cancer.

Due to the potential for negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 measured on 1cm2, but not to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the maximum SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure

If you've ever operated a cell phone, then you're aware that a safe range from the tower should be at least 400 meters. This is due to the power of transmission from the cell tower is significantly increased the farther your location from the tower.



While it sounds like an ideal idea, the reality is that people who live close to towers could be more susceptible to health problems. For example, a study from 2014 in India discovered that people who lived within 50m of cell towers experienced significantly more health complaints than those who lived farther far from antennas.

This study showed that residents who moved to areas further away from the cell towers saw their symptoms improve within a couple of days. Other studies have shown that exposure to high frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancers as well as other health issues.

This is because RF radiation, which is used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's outer layer, which is the skin. It is crucial to know because the skin acts as a barrier to protect against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as entry of toxic substances. The skin is the biggest organ of the human body and is accountable for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on numerous assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research.  how to block radiation  include the false belief that exposures of a short duration to RF radiation are safe due to minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. the heating of tissues).

The assumption is also ignoring the greater penetration of ELF components of modulated RF signals, as well as the consequences on the body of short bursts caused by RF pulses. These assumptions do not correspond with current understanding of the biological effects of RF radiation. As such, they should not be used for health protective exposure standards.

Furthermore to that, ICNIRP and FCC limit their exposure limits to local peak SARs that are based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR) which is an inadequate dosimetric tool to assess the amount of radiation exposure. Particularly the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been tested for RF radiation exposed to other environmental agents such like sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation and other agents in the environment could cause synergistic or antagonistic effects. This could result in an increased risk of adverse health effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can cause an increase in the incidence of developing skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin disorders, such as acne.